First drafts, not a build authorization. Joe has asked for detailed narrative explanations before further dispatch, because conceptual errors can survive polished implementations and worked arithmetic.
These posts work through one recurring situation: transferring a mission with a disputed success claim to its next reviewer. They use actual library patterns to ask what the machine would need to understand, predict, do and demonstrate. The particular episode is an illustrative scenario, not measured data.
The five sections were originally presented as a priority sequence. They are now arguments to examine. In particular, purpose and participant concerns in the fifth post constrain the model in the first; they cannot wait until after the code is fixed.
At each step, ask what the real problem is, which competing concerns a pattern addresses, why an interpretation would help, what the model predicts, and what would establish that it actually helped. A type-correct table or a successful command cannot supply a missing answer.
The drafts identify unresolved choices rather than silently settling them. No probability values, mission-state interpretation, new G formula or construction packet is authorized by publication. Five files are not by themselves evidence of conceptual agreement.
Zai-7 and zai-8's existing work on the cascade-policy example may continue under Joe's exception. The second walkthrough discusses its remaining design argument, and distinguishes authoring a design from running that design. These posts are published at the site root as requested; the example's existing URL is left intact.
The foldable checklist remains the accepted-in-substance completion account. The new drafts elaborate it and may reveal reasons to correct our understanding; they do not tick any of its boxes. Each post names the particular sources and checklist items it uses. Editable Markdown and the source-snapshot manifest live in p4ng/wm-walkthroughs/.
The two premature P1 commissions were withdrawn through Agency's job-specific cancellation endpoint. The existing work tracker records the dispatch hold. No new review or implementation dispatch is issued for this series.
Draft patterns grouped by walkthrough, with scoped references to the existing AIF collection. No AIF files are copied into these collections.
WM-01 through WM-14: pattern applications, dependencies and acceptance evidence. These designs evolve through the build bellbacks; they do not mark the checklist complete.