Authored design — 2026-09-15. Section 3. This cascade elaborates the existing checklist item. It is not a dispatch, implementation receipt or completion verdict. Work outside WM-01–14 still requires Joe’s explicit greenlight; having a cascade is necessary but not permission.
Section 3/4 index · Exact TODO · Cascade JSON
A terminal seed does not show which preferences govern a real choice. R19 connects authored, composed and revisable C to compatible predictions.
R19 preferences. PARTIAL: WM-06's compatible predictive bridge plus WM-13 and declared authorship, composition and revision provenance. Built evidence: Terminal seed and channel C as WM-06
This is the checklist’s dated evidence account, not a new deployment census. Existing source/test evidence keeps its bounded credit. The acceptance obligation above governs this design.
Pattern: wm-purpose-and-account/recipient-benefit-shapes-the-model
Record participant concerns and the authorized preference authorship at this grain. Produce the outcome rationale; artifact counts or preferences for particular evidence content cannot replace it.
Pattern: wm-pattern-design/preference-family-needs-composition
Use WM-06/13 to select the actual grain/time member and justified predictive bridge. Retain domain/support and unresolved members; do not reuse terminal C everywhere by default.
Pattern: wm-pattern-design/preference-family-needs-composition
Retain layer identities, order, operators and revision authority from the real fold. An empty-layer theorem must not certify a nonempty runtime declaration. Produce the effective C with full provenance.
Pattern: wm-purpose-and-account/recipient-benefit-shapes-the-model
Show the scorer consuming that effective C and participant-relevant outcome evidence informing any authorized revision. Preserve earlier preferences and evaluations; feedback does not grant agents authority to choose new goals.
Each node’s stated artifact is the input or constraint for the related node below. These are design dependencies, not a claim that a runtime scheduler automatically fires patterns. Existing WM producers are reused through the linked contracts; no second implementation is implied.
| From | To | Relation | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| R19-1 | R19-2 | requires-result | Participant concerns constrain admissible outcome and preference interpretation. |
| R19-2 | R19-3 | requires-result | Resolved family members determine the actual composition inputs. |
| R19-3 | R19-4 | requires-result | Only the composed member consumed by the scorer governs this decision. |
| R19-4 | R19-1 | revision-feedback | A failed distinguishing control or consumer mismatch reopens the original scope/meaning; retain the failed claim rather than weakening it. Relevant controls: Reject swapped fold order, wrong domain, unsupported layer, hidden renormalization and preferences changed without authority. Preserve zero-preference exclusions. |
Retain the actual subject, source/model revision, task/occurrence, cutoff, producer and consumer for each interface. A missing field is a named gap; a default that changes the meaning is not an adapter. Reuse existing records where they satisfy these obligations. If a new component is indispensable, identify its exact TODO/cascade clause before seeking a separately bounded implementation instruction.
An introspective layer changes a distribution that the scorer never reads. The declared fold may be mathematically sound, but R19 lacks the consumer join. Conversely, a consumed terminal seed still does not close the family obligation.
This is a distinguishing design example, not a claimed production experiment.
Distinguishing controls: Reject swapped fold order, wrong domain, unsupported layer, hidden renormalization and preferences changed without authority. Preserve zero-preference exclusions.
Closure rule: every part of the quoted obligation must be supported by the indicated artifacts and actual connections. A useful rejection proves the rejecting boundary only. One accepted subclause does not tick the whole item. A bellback must supply the exact reviewed subject, executed checks, independent verdict and remaining clauses.
Mission-layer and other unresolved preference choices remain for their authority; this node supplies no replacement weights.
Dependency links describe required interfaces; they do not authorize work on those items. No implementation outside the existing TODO list is approved. Publication does not select a numerical law, settle an unresolved operator ruling or authorize a run.
All seeded patterns are applied above. The JSON pins their source bytes and the governing checklist/rulings. Historical formulas, thresholds and examples in a pattern remain scoped examples unless the governing contract adopts them. This draft adds no pattern-library entries and claims no independent semantic ratification.